Analytic Quality Glossary
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Home
Citation reference: Harvey, L., 2004–9, Analytic Quality Glossary, Quality Research International, http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/
This is a dynamic glossary and the author would welcome any e-mail suggestions for amendments or additions.
____________________________________________________________________
A learning outcome is the specification
of what a student should learn as the result of a period of specified and
supported study.
explanatory context
Learning outcomes are
concerned with the achievements of the learner rather than the intentions of
the teacher (expressed in the aims of a module or course). They can take many
forms and can be broad or narrow in nature (Adam, 2004).
Learning outcomes and ‘aims
and objectives’ are often used synonymously, although they are not the same.
Adam (2004) notes that ‘Aims are concerned with teaching
and the teacher’s intentions whilst learning outcomes are concerned with
learning’ and Moon (2002) suggests that one way to distinguish aims from learning
outcomes is that aims indicate the general content, direction and intentions
behind the module from the designer/teacher viewpoint.
However, learning outcomes and
objectives are more difficult to distinguish
as objectives can be written in terms that are very similar to that used in
learning outcomes. Indeed, in the
analytical review
One attempt to synthesise
various definitions states:
A learning outcome is a
written statement of what the successful student/learner is expected to be able
to do at the end of the module/course unit, or qualification. (Adam, 2004)
The
Credit Common Accord for
Statements of what a
learner can be expected to know, understand and/or do as a result of a learning
experience. (QCA /LSC,
2004, p. 12)
The skills
and knowledge a student will possess upon successful completion of a course.
Learning outcomes as set out in
1.
Subject knowledge and understanding;
2.
Subject-specific skills are practical skills, practice of which is integral to
the course, e.g. laboratory skills, language skills,
counselling skills;
3. Cognitive skills, intellectual skills such as an understanding
of methodologies, synthesis, evaluation or ability in critical analysis;
4. Key skills are skills that are readily transferable to
employment in other contexts, such as written and oral communication, working
within a team, problem solving, numeracy and IT
skills.
Learning
Outcome: An expression of what a student will demonstrate on the successful
completion of a module. Learning outcomes:
·
are related to the level of the learning;
·
indicate the intended gain in knowledge and skills that a typical
student will achieve;
·
should be capable of being
assessed.
The university distinguished the module outcomes from those for the programme, which is defines as follows:
Programme
Outcome: An expression contained within a programme specification of what a
typical learner will have achieved at the end of the programme. Programme
outcomes are related to the qualification level and will relate to the sum of
the experience of learners on a particular programme. (
UMIST
(2001) defines a learning outcome as:
Learning
Outcome: the acquisition of the knowledge, skill or understanding that is the
desired outcome of a learning process.
The ECTS (EU, 2004) view is that:
Learning outcomes are statements of what a learner is
expected to know, understand and/or be able to demonstrate after a completion
of a process of learning.
A
Canadian view is that:
Learning outcome
statements are content standards for the provincial education system. Learning
outcomes are statements of what students are expected to know and to do at an
indicated grade, they comprise the prescribed curriculum. (BC, 2004)
CHEA (2003,
p. 5) provides a definition, with riders:
Student learning outcomes are
properly defined in terms of the knowledge, skills, and abilities that a
student has attained at the end (or as a result) of his or her engagement in a
particular set of higher education experiences. Not all of the outcomes of
college are confined to learning. Additional behavioral
outcomes or experiences that may result from attending an institution or
program include employment and increased career mobility, enhanced incomes and
lifestyles, the opportunity to enroll for additional
education, or simply a more fulfilled and reflective life. Hopefully, these are
related to learning. Indeed, evidence that students have obtained such benefits
is often used by institutions and programs as a proxy for instructional
effectiveness. But such subsequent experiences, however successful, should not
be confused with actual mastery of what has been taught. Similarly, student and
graduate satisfaction is important, especially as it is related to persistence
and the continuing opportunity to learn. But it should not be confused with
student learning itself. P. 5
A view from
AALL (2004) adds a normative element to the
definition:
Learning outcomes are statements that
specify what learners will know or be able to do as a result of a learning
activity. Outcomes are usually expressed as knowledge, skills, or attitudes.
Learning outcomes should flow from a needs assessment. The needs
assessment should determine the gap between an existing condition and a desired
condition. Learning outcomes are statements that describe a desired
condition—that is, the knowledge, skills, or attitudes required to fulfill the need. They represent the solution to the
identified need or issue. Learning outcomes provide direction in the
planning of a learning activity.
The UNESCO definition identifies both outcomes and student learning outcomes although they do not differ much:
Outcomes: Anticipated
or achieved results of programmes or the accomplishment of institutional
objectives, as demonstrated by a wide range of indicators (such as student
knowledge, cognitive skills, and attitudes). Outcomes are direct results of the
instructional programme, planned in terms of student/learner growth in all
areas. An outcome must be distinguished from an objective, which is a
sought-after result. Generally, each outcome statement should describe one
effect of the instructional programme, and not accumulate several into one
statement. Also, the statements should be clearly detailed and easily
understandable by all teaching staff and students in the given area or
department.
Student Learning Outcomes: Statements of what a learner is expected to know,
understand, and/or be able to demonstrate after completion of a process of
learning as well as the specific intellectual and practical skills gained and
demonstrated by the successful completion of a unit, course, or programme.
Learning outcomes, together with assessment criteria, specify the minimum
requirements for the award of credit, while grading is
based on attainment above or below the minimum requirements for the award of
credit. Learning outcomes are distinct from the aims of learning in that they
are concerned with the achievements of the learner rather than with the overall
intentions of the teacher. (Vlăsceanu et al., 2004, pp.
41–42)
Adam
(2004) notes
The creation of learning outcomes is not a precise science and they require considerable thought to write – it is easy to get them wrong and create a learning strait jacket. Learning outcomes are commonly further divided into different categories of outcomes. The most common sub-divisions are between: subject specific outcomes that relate to the subject discipline and the knowledge and/or skills particular to it; and generic (sometimes called key transferable skills) outcomes that relate to any and all disciplines e.g. written, oral, problem-solving, information technology, and team working skills, etc. The identification of generic skills is seen as important in enhancing the employability of graduates whatever their discipline.
related terms
See
also
sources
Adam, S., 2004, Using Learning Outcomes, Report for
United Kingdom Bologna Seminar 1-2 July 2004, Heriot-Watt
University (Edinburgh Conference Centre) Edinburgh.
American Association of Law Libraries (AALL), 2004, Developing and
Submitting a Program Proposal to the AALL
Professional Development Committee, ‘What are learning outcomes?’ http://www.aallnet.org/prodev/guide_for_developing_and_submitt.asp
Council for Higher Education
Accreditation (CHEA) CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and
Quality Assurance, 2003, Statement Of Mutual Responsibilities for Student
Learning Outcomes: Accreditation,
Institutions, and
Programs, September 2003. pdf available at http://www.chea.org/Research/index.asp
European
Union (EU), 2004, ECTS Users’ Guide – European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System for
Lifelong Learning, European Commission. Published summer 2004.
Government of British Colombia Ministry of Education (BC).referenced in Adam (2004).
Moon, J., 2002, The Module and Programmes Development Handbook (
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
and Learning + Skills Council (QCA /LSC) 2004, Principles
for a credit framework for