Analytic Quality Glossary

 

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Home

 

Citation reference: Harvey, L., 2004-17, Analytic Quality Glossary, Quality Research International, http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/

This is a dynamic glossary and the author would welcome any e-mail suggestions for additions or amendments. Page updated 2 January, 2017 , © Lee Harvey 2004–2017.

 

A fast-paced novel of conjecture and surprises
   

_________________________________________________________________

Peer


core definition

Peer, in the context of quality in higher education, is a person who understands the context in which a quality review is being undertaken and is able to contribute to the process


explanatory context

Peers tend to be people external to the institution, or programme being reviewed. In the case of peer review of an individual’s performance, the person may be a colleague, a manager or an external expert.

 

In general, peer, just means a person who is of equal standing with another in a group.

 

There are few definitions of peer in the literature, most focus on defining peer review, the nature of the peer being often implicit or subsumed in phrases such as ‘respected peer’, ‘external expert’, ‘trusted colleague’, ‘critical friend’.


analytical review

One definition is:

Peer: Also: external expert, inspector. Member of a selected team evaluating a unit but who is not connected to it. Programme officer: Upper-level employee of an evaluation or accreditation agency coordinating, assisting, and carrying out the administration of evaluation or accreditation procedures. (Campbell & Rozsnyai, 2002, p. 133)


Platt (1981, p. 76) provides a more generic definition of a peer:

One’s peers have a variety of relevant characteristics: they are in a diffuse sense one’ssocial equals, they are one’s equals in role-specific senses, they share the same backgroundknowledge and subcultural understandings, and they are members of thesame groups or communities. Some of these characteristics may, of course, occurwithout others, and the consequences vary accordingly.


associated issues

 


related areas

See also

external expert

peer review


Sources

Campbell, C. & Rozsnyai, C., 2002, Quality Assurance and the Development of Course Programmes. Papers on Higher Education Regional University Network on Governance and Management of Higher Education in South East Europe Bucharest, UNESCO.

Platt, J., 1981, ‘On interviewing one’s peers’, British Journal of Sociology 32(1), pp. 75–91.


copyright Lee Harvey 2004–2017



A NOVEL Who bombed a Birmingham mosque?

Top

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Home