6.2.2 Focus and presumptions of conversation analysis
Conversation analysis concentrates on how speakers themselves interpret each other's inputs to the conversation. It explores how talk, as a form of social action, is organised into a sequential process.
Conversation analysis presumes (as noted in Section 18.104.22.168.2) that this conversational process is an accomplished act and based on common sets of procedures, which reflects ethnomethodological presuppositions. However (as also was noted in Section 22.214.171.124.2) the increasing focus on the structure of conversations has arguably moved conversational analysis away from the phenomenological roots of ethnomethodology.
Conversation analysis adopts an empirical and inductive approach and avoids theorising (in contrast to discourse analysis, see Section 6.1). It proceeds by analysing detailed transcripts of authentic ordinary speech events (that is conversations in the broadest sense) and attempts to identify systematic recurrence of patterns.
Conversation analysts focus on what people do in conversation (their moves), rather than subjective explanation. Following the tenets of ethnomethodology, early conversation analysts were interested in examining the micro-practices of conversation.
The acknowledged originator of conversation analysis is Harvey Sacks. He developed the idea as a result of listening to tapes of helpline conversations and was intrigued by the way that people introduced themselves and their problems. He saw the process of interaction as a sociological issue, he was not interested in the problems people had but how they engaged with other people on the telephone.
As Sacks later noted:
The gross aim of the work I am doing is to see how finely the details of actual, naturally occurring conversation can be subjected to analysis that will yield the technology of conversation. The idea is to take singular sequences of conversation and tear them apart in such a way as to find rules, techniques, procedures, methods, maxims (a collection of terms that more or less relate to each other and that I use somewhat interchangeably) that can be used to generate the orderly features we find in the conversations we examine. The point is, then, to come back to the singular things we observe in a singular sequence, with some rules that handle those singular features, and also, necessarily, handle lots of other events. (Sacks, 1984b, p. 411)